A friend asked us for information on locomotive assignments for the Revelstoke Subdivision in 1950 so that he could number his newly acquired D-10 model locomotive. After digging around in our "Kettle Valley archives" and thinking about sharing what is there, we were moved to start posting again after a long hiatus. We will begin with a short review of the model and then expand to look at engine assignments for the D-10's in the Pacific (B.C.) Region in the late 1940's and early 1950's. Here is an image of the unlettered model from Rapido's Website.
The Rapido Ten-Wheelers are
fresh out of the factory in China and are selling very well. Several reviews
on-line are favorable and a short period of testing on the Kettle Valley Model
Railway was positive overall. Here is an extensive review of the model by a happy purchaser: https://forum.mrhmag.com/post/rapido-d10-first-look-12786805?pid=1336495875
PERFORMANCE: The model crawled at a scale 0.7 mile per hour at speed step 1. At speed step 12 she moved well at 13 scale m.p.h. but at speed step 28, she flew by at 56 scale m.p.h.! There was no stalling or cogging observable in the slow speeds which was impressive. Unfortunately, there was not enough time for more testing after a train of 15 cars with free-rolling trucks made her slip and stall out on the 2.2% grade even with the traction tire fitted on the rear axle. With the traction tire, the model should handle a reasonable freight train of at least 10 cars but someone else will have to test her with metal tires. Rapido has a video on the engine's capabilities on a 1.7% grade here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gfoSUHSkoqE&t=1s
BUILD & DETAIL: The detailing of the model is of the highest quality. The lighting functions were numerous and delightful: headlight, tender light, number board, class lights, ground lights and firebox flicker. Drivers and rods were well done. The many extra parts with the undecorated model are easily installed on the model to match the particular prototype one may wish to replicate.
SOUND: The factory settings for the decoder sounds are much too loud for our tender ears but that is easily adjustable. To be frank, the overall sound quality is not as good as our Kettle Valley engine models with their shop-built lead speakers and TCS decoders. The brake squeal is excessive when braking at slow speeds but perhaps there is room for adjustment in the programming. The chuff was well synchronized with the driver rotation - perhaps there is a cam to enable this.
CAUTION: The drawbar coupling is fragile and can be broken or worse if the plug is not connected with care. It is somewhat surprising that the thing works at all - since the plug has to withstand the pull of a train - but it seems to work on the Royal Hudsons which have been around for some time now.
Here is a listing of D-10's
that worked the BC rails in 1947 transcribed from a faint copy of an official CPR Document given to us
by Ted Howe many years ago. There were 20 active D-10's operating in BC at the time, most of them on Vancouver Island.
LOCOMOTIVE DISTRIBUTION PACIFIC (B.C.) REGION | ||
Period Ending February 15th, 1947. | ||
Revelstoke Division: | ||
Okanagan Sub. | Way Freight | 983 |
Mixed | 962 (maroon panels) | |
Fruit | 985 | |
Shuswap Sub. Freight | Freight | 926 |
Vancouver Division: | ||
Ioco & Coquitlam | Sw. & Transfer | 724 (scrapped 1948) |
Kootenay Division: | ||
Boundary & Rossland Sub. | Passenger | 954 |
Kettle Valley Division: | ||
D-9's only | [569, 592.] | |
Esquimalt & Nanaimo Division: | ||
Victoria Sub. | Passenger | 922 |
All Subdivisions | Freight | 901, 906, 907, 908, 909, 910, |
911, 914, 915, 918, 920, 923, | ||
925 |
The 14 D-10's on the E&N were transferred in early 1949 to the mainland when they were displaced by the early Baldwin Road-switchers in the 8000 series. The chart following shows where they went including 3 for the Kettle Valley Division: Nos. 907, 914, & 925. The ill-fated 907 suffered a boiler explosion that killed the engine watchman and destroyed the roundhouse in March of 1949. The Riegger Book has a photo of her on page 216.
LOCOMOTIVE DISTRIBUTION PACIFIC (B.C.) REGION | ||
Period Ending March 14th, 1950. | ||
Revelstoke Division: | ||
Arrow Lakes | Mixed | 923 |
Okanagan Sub. | Way Freight | 918 |
Mixed | 962 (maroon panels) | |
Switching | 983 | |
Mountain Sub. | Work | 910, 985. |
Vancouver Division: | ||
Mission Sub. | Mixed | 922 |
Thompson Sub. | Work & Sw. | 909 |
Cascade Sub. | Way Freight | 906 |
Kootenay Division: | ||
Cranbrook - Nelson Subs. | Way Freight | 1036 |
Lake Windermere Sub. | Frt. & Mixed | 901, 908, 911, 915. |
Boundary & Rossland Sub. | Passenger | 954 |
Kettle Valley Division: | ||
Carmi & Princeton Subs. | Way Freight | 914 |
Osoyoos Sub. | Freight | 925 |
Esquimalt & Nanaimo Division: | ||
None - [Baldwins] |
For further information on the Kettle Valley D-10's there is an earlier post here: http://kettlevalleymodelrailway.blogspot.com/2019/
Coquihalla Man
Thanks for posting this. Also been following the thread on MRH you mentioned. I picked up a few of these D10's ostensibly for modeling the E&N though I do have an interest in late steam-era operations in interior BC as well. A few notes: I bought 922, 926, and an unlettered (low headlight). Rapido's 922 seems to be largely "correct" for that engine's appearance while on the E&N. Their 926 was advertised as coming with either coal or oil tender but mine came with coal only (they'll sell you another insert if you want). The real 926 was wrecked while on the E&N about 1949, Rapido's model seems to reflect the engine's appearance after it was rebuilt following the wreck (high walkway vs. low on the engineer's side), though it has the angled numberboards. My unlettered model came with both tender inserts, parts to change the walkway heights and steam pipes as well as a few other things, but curiously while they included a spare headlight (duplicate of the low one already installed), they did not include the flat numberboard shown in the artwork; the model has an angled numberboard installed. I have inquired with Rapido about this but haven't heard back yet. FWIW I'm planning to model 918, which after the E&N was documented in Nelson, and then on the branch to Arrowhead, among other places. Anyway... always enjoyed your modeling. Take care.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your appreciative comments. Interesting description of your intentions with regard to these nice models. I am wondering about the drawbar arrangement and if it withstands the pull of a full train behind it. The lighting features are impressive, especially the angled number board.
ReplyDeleteGreat article on the D10's, however the Rapido versions are not as good as they can be as a few have failed for what I had seen and a few had to be sent back for repairs. Mostly problems with running gear or side ride failures at most. One D10 had a bad decoder that also was sent back. I hope Rapido does better in future as they can not seem to figure out Steam as of yet. cheers
ReplyDelete